NRA and AIPAC are cast in the same mold
Why is it really necessary for American citizens to bear semi-automatic rifles--which can easily be transformed into full-automatic--to feel safe?

Whenever one listens to the speeches delivered at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and that of the National Rifle Association (NRA), the first thing that pops into your mind–if it is still not been inculcated by the mass media, ironically controlled by the two organizations—is that how can they ignore the realities so miserably and still come back delivering the same thing next year?

How can you listen to the ideas of arming teachers with rifles so that schools can be safer—and of course no tighter gun control rules–and still not wonder who are these people? How can Israeli officials and, the US politician in their payroll, claim that they are trying to create a safer Middle East by destroying anything that is standing against Israeli killing machine?

Every time there is a mass shooting which is committed by a white person–white because when committed by a Muslim or black we all know we are faced with a different story here–the issue of gun control comes to the fore.
To an outsider, many things here do not make sense. Why is it really necessary for American citizens to bear semi-automatic rifles–which can easily be transformed into full-automatic–to feel safe?

Indeed what do these people have in their mind when they say “safe”? What does it mean to them? To get the answer one should look at the root of these two anti-safety organizations of our modern age.

Parts of that answer lies in the people supporting the founding causes of these two powerful lobbies.
As an institution committed to assuring the ready availability of weapons of mass murder in the market, NRA is deeply rooted in American polity. In an opinion piece published soon after yet another mass school shooting, the New York Times publicized the names of top US “lawmakers” actively on the payroll of the NRA. Senator John McCain of Arizona has received more than $7m, Senator Richard Burr close to $7m, Senators Roy Blunt and Thom Tillis each almost $5m apiece. The list goes on.

Many of such sums of money are provided by Jews supporting the idea of bearing arm –and again by relating that to their history– as a way to keep ruling and not being dominated.
One the comprising member of NRA is a Jewish group called Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO).

According to the JPFO website the “JPFO initially aimed at educating the Jewish community about the historical evils that Jews have suffered when they have been disarmed” and then later expanded to prove that “’gun control’ had played a fundamental role in all the major genocides of the 20th Century … not just the Holocaust.” the JPFO is noted for its extreme view of gun control legislation.

Simply put, JPFO believes that in order to be safe you need to be armed to the teeth, and the only way to stop yet another “genocide” is by amassing guns to hands of nations controlled by the Jews, that is Israel and the US.

From a historical point of view there is a striking similarity between the catastrophes befalling the Palestinian nation and those happening to the US people. When reading the story of Palestinian issue, we are left puzzled asking ourselves; okay, so there were Nazi Germany troops killing many Jews. Why do the Palestinians have to pay the price by getting deprived of their lands?

The same question can be asked here when reading the JPFO; so Jews were disarmed and killed by Natzi Germany troops. Why do the Americans have to pay the price by having a heavily-armed society whose people once in a while turn the gun at each other?

The answer here is that the logic creating and shoring up AIPAC and NRA do not care for how many people are killed and who their nationalities are as long as these two anti-safety organizations can rule and dominate.

As simply put by JPFO, Jews, and their allies, must be armed with the state-of-the-art technology if they want to dominate and not get dominated. And for them to be armed, the other nations must not be allowed to acquire “any game-changing weapons.”

That itself has created a tense arms race around the word that has been a lucrative business for, well the Jews—the same money earned here would also be spent to support US lawmakers and freeze their minds so that they can never think of even getting closed to change this game.

And of course, for this business to churn out more money there needs to be more wars and wars. And Israelis have taken the lead here.

When reading the logic of JPFO, one can clearly see the sense of revenge. In fact, Jews are saying: now it is our time. This is the underlying cause for killing and maiming thousands of Palestinians and forcing them to leave their land for more than 70 years.

NRA and AIPAC have reached the same conclusion in their definition of safety: for you to be safe, the others must be vulnerable, and in the meantime you can make good money.

HT IUVMPRESS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

− 2 = 2