Sajid Javid blames anything but cuts for rising crime rates – and Twitter has a field day
With the rising rates of crime in the headlines, Sajid Javid appeared on The Andrew Marr Show to share the government’s latest ideas.

But his platitude-heavy pledge to focus on “root causes and early intervention,” got him a Twitter response similar to the one that greeted Amber Rudd’s theory that social media is to blame for rising numbers of London murders:

There’s more to it than police numbers

Comic David Schneider was more than happy to list a few other possible reasons for the spike in violent crime:

Twitter user Mark Armstrong also had a humourous response:

Wider Issues

Sajid Javid’s exchange with Marr highlights the Conservatives’ somewhat laissez-faire analysis of the effects austerity has had on public safety.

While he may want to focus on “root causes and intervention”, he seems to forget how this government has been systematically dismantling programmes that address this very issue.

In November 2017 The Financial Times reported that [paywall]:

The wider effects of austerity on… social care and mental health provision have left police as the service of last resort, adding to workloads. The number of calls to Scotland Yard by Londoners concerned about another person’s mental health has increased by a third since the cuts began.

On 5 April, The Guardian reported:

shutting down youth services, including successful programmes to tackle gang violence, was always likely to ricochet. Youth services went first in the post-2010 slash-and-burn of council budgets. The young poor were early targets for all benefits cuts: their education maintenance allowance went [and] their families lost child tax credits, child benefit and housing benefit.

Early intervention

It’s clear that changing life trajectories for people who are the most disadvantaged requires intervention at a young age. By agreeing now that this is vital, Sajid Javid has given a tacit admission that this government has failed our young.

Sending
User Review
5 (1 vote)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

− 5 = 4